Ignorance and Dysfunction: The Obama Administration and the War in Afghanistan

A few weeks ago, after a stealth drone crashed in Iran and its subsequent recovery and publicization by the Iranian government, I thought we appeared weak.  The official response was a formal letter to the Iranian government requesting that they please, nay, “pretty please with a cherry on top” give it back or else we’ll be really upset.  Iran replied with the expected “no, finders keepers” defense.  So we moved from being weak to simply appearing impotent on the world stage.  At least it can’t get any worse…right?  Way to keep me on my toes Obama administration, now I know there is no lower limit to what you will do. The fact is, this incident is only the icing on the cake of Obama foreign policy ineptitude. The administration continues to pursue a muddled and naive approach to Afghanistan as well.

Afghanistan is a crazy place, which often seemed dysfunctional to me when I was there.  Apparently that dysfunction has seeped into the current administration’s policy on how we engage the Taliban in that country.

Recently, news broke that a deal, in principle, for peace talks had been struck with the Taliban.  The U.S. will release “high ranking Taliban officials” in exchange for the initiation of negotiations to take place in Qatar at a “Taliban political office.”  Among the leaders to be released are Mullah Khair Khowa, a former interior minister and governor of the northwestern province of Herat, and Noorullah Noori, also a former governor and a senior Taliban military commander.  These are just two of the “high-risk detainee[s]” named in the apparent barter.  Other reports indicate that a deal hasn’t been reached, but that the individuals have been mentioned in previous meetings between the U.S. and the Taliban over the past year.

Why is this ignorant and dysfunctional?  After all, negotiations and diplomacy are a part of the conflict resolution process and could lead to the United States ability withdraw it’s men and women in uniform from the far-flung stretches of the globe.

This agreement shows that the Obama administration doesn’t understand who our enemies, in-country known as “Anti-Afghan Forces” (AAF), are.  Mullah Muhammed Omar may be the former president of the “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,” and he may be the spiritual leader of the Taliban. He may be worth up to 10 million U.S. dollars on the U.S. State Department’s “Rewards for Justice” program; but he is not the leader, in the typical sense, of the AAF, or for that matter the average fighter who attacks Afghan, U.S., and coalition forces on a daily basis in Kandahar, Kabul or Konar.

The average fighter in Afghanistan is not necessarily ideologically aligned with the Taliban or other groups, such as Al Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin (HIG), Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LET), Jaysh-e-Muhammed (JEM) or any other of the organizations that compose the alphabet soup of the Afghan insurgency.  They may be affiliates or offshoots (as many of the groups were offshoots of a previous group), but not the typical “card carrying member” we wish we could envision here in the West.  Rather, the typical fighter is a local villager who, like most other Afghans, doesn’t have a means of sustenance and can make money by carrying out an attack.  Usually, they are paid a bounty through “hawallah” banks funded by wealthy sympathizers who don’t wish to dirty their own hands but still support the jihad.  Fire a mortar, $15; shoot at a convoy, $25; plant an improvised explosive device, $50, fight for a month: $300.  This is especially hard to quell when “pay day jihadist” can make more money a month than an enlisted soldier in the Afghan National Army.  It’s all economic to a lot of the foot soldiers (a similar phenomenon was prevalent in Iraq, where children would be paid to throw a grenade at a US convoy).

Even if all the fighters were affiliated members of a particular group, peace negotiations would be inconsequential, as most of these organizations are “bottom-up,” as opposed to “top-down” in the manner of Western hierarchies.  A peace struck with Mullah Omar, Hekmatyr Gulbuddin or any other insurgent leader in Kabul, Quetta or Qatar will not necessarily translate to a peace in the valleys of eastern Afghanistan or the barren planes of the South.

This is especially worrisome when it is considered that the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is merely a line on the map that only Western governments appear to recognize.  As long as there are safe havens in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (specifically Bajaur, Waziristan, and Khyber) and Nuristan, Nangahar, Konar and Laghman (N2KL) Provinces of Afghanistan, they will continue to be impediments to any brokered peace deal.  Our policy vis-à-vis Pakistan has been to treat it with kid gloves at the best and turning a blind eye to its support and sustainment of the Afghan insurgency at worst.  Our inability to mass enough force to adequately control N2KL (specifically Nuristan and Konar) for sustained periods of time has caused locals to learn the lesson the AAF has preached in that area: ‘The Americans will leave, but we will stay.  Choose your side wisely.”

Consider the Pech River Valley and it’s corollaries (for which I have a special affinity having served there and for memories’ sake carried back some grenade metal in my knee and shoulder).  Marines initially occupied it in 2005, the Army took over and expanded the sphere of influence into the Korengal and Waygul Valleys.  After a series of attacks in 2007, U.S. forces pulled back from the Waygul Valley, the Korengal was left a few years later; AAF took control of previous U.S. Combat Outposts, delivering AAF a huge morale and propaganda victory.  Months later all U.S. forces withdrew from the Pech Valley only to reoccupy it six months later with less troops.  Needless to say, gains that were made over the years were lost in those six months.

Obama's "Friends With Benefits?"












If they do proceed, these peace negotiations will merely offer the Taliban leaders cover and reinforcements as high-level detainees are released back onto the battlefield.  Winter is the typical period used by the AAF to rest, rearm, and refit.  The harsh winters of the highlands deny them safe haven and adequate egress once they have conducted attacks on coalition forces; additionally, resupply lines, usually through mountain passes, to Pakistan are inaccessible.  If the U.S. is engaged with the “leaders” it is not likely that the military will be allowed to conduct offensive actions, thus allowing time to better prepare and organize for the annual “spring offensive,” or “fighting season.”

Additionally, the fact that the U.S. recognizes the Taliban enough to negotiate with them legitimizes their standing.  When else has the U.S. negotiated with a non-state actor, much less a non-state actor hostile to our interests?  It appears that since Iran didn’t want to play ball President Obama is getting his wish to negotiate with someone without preconditions and doubling down by possibly releasing high valued prisoners.

Kenneth Depew // University of St. Thomas (TX) // @depewk



  1. Kerry the conservative says:

    Hey thanks for your service… Sorry about the shrapnel. Great article. Those who financially support jihad get credit as if they performed jihad themselves. So how much will they get paid when we leave…

  2. Great article.
    -From Kandahar.

  3. You seem to making the argument that it is pointless to be in Afghanistan. We are not fighting anyone but mercenary’s and poor villagers that just need money. If that is true then yes the talks are pointless. We have occupied a foreign land for over a decade now. Anyone that started the fight is dead and now the children that were 10 when the war started are just picking it up. 92% of the Afghans don’t even know what started the war. How would you feel if your uncle or father were killed when you were a child by a foreign solder when you were young?

  4. How did it come to pass that a drone worth billions in sensitive high-tech R&D, a drone which was Obama’s primary means of killing Muslim terrorist leaders (his singular success story in destroying those who seek America’s destruction), was captured by our enemies? You suggest that it was the result of weak, impotent or inept foreign policy. But ponder the hard facts:
    -A primary element of the “drone system” is an infallible means of destroying the drone to prevent the enemy from capturing it.
    -Command centers are in constant satellite communication with the drone and can command “self destruct now” instructions at any time.
    -Drones have internal self-destruct systems which are automatically triggered if situations occur that might result in enemy capture.

    So, why wasn’t the drone destroyed before the enemy captured it?

    There are two possible answers: “self destruct” systems failed, which might include:
    -Communication with the command centers was lost and no “self destruct” communication to the drone was possible.
    -The drone’s internal self destruct mode failed to activate after communication was lost.
    -Command center personnel inadvertently failed to transmit “self-destruct” commands.
    -The internal drone self-destruct systems failed to activate, kind of as in (imagine what the drone was “thinking”): “Hey, why aren’t you talking to me? Why aren’t you controlling where I’m going?“; “What’s this? I sense some outsider communication trying to take me go where we don’t want it to go. What should I do?”; “Hey, are you sure you want me to land in Iran?” And finally, “I need some answers right now or I’m blowing myself up.” But that didn’t happen.
    -Failure of our Defense Department to destroy the drone. But how many personnel would have had to have been aware that the drone was in imminent danger of being captured? More than a few: the drone “pilot”; his immediate supervisors…and their supervisors; all levels of surveillance personnel –satellite visual, satellite radio, computer technicians monitoring the systems, troubleshooters — lots of people. And we are to believe that not one of them yelled: “Hey, shouldn’t we destroy the damned thing before the Revolutionary Guard gets their bloody hands on it?”?

    Not even after it landed did anyone suggest destroying the drone, even though we knew its exact location, through its emergency beacon, similar to what airliners carry, and/or satellite imagery.

    The other possible answer as to why it was not destroyed – nay, the only plausible answer — is that its capture by our enemy was intentional: Obama knew that it was going to be captured. Dick Cheney said precisely what Obama’s response should have been: “The right response to that would have been to go in immediately after it had gone down and destroy it.” But Obama didn’t do that.

    The loss of this American asset which was successful in killing terrorist leaders; which was successful in saving American troops from the task of hunting them down, “on the ground,” at great peril; which gave Americans a greater level of security against terrorism, was not the result of system failures nor the result of Defense Department malfeasance. The loss of this American asset must have been intentional, ordered by Obama himself. There is no other explanation.

    And honestly, should we be surprised that Obama is capable of such…some might call it treason?

    Remember, this is the guy who spent 20 years in “Reverend” Wright’s church. Yeah, the very same reverend who preached, “No, not God bless America, God damn America!”; who preached that whites invented AIDS to kill blacks; who performed his wedding ceremony and baptized his children.

    Remember, this is the guy who publicly supports America-hating socialists like the Occupy Wall Street mobs, along with Michael Moore, Hollywood and all the rest of the filthy rich liberals.

    Remember, this is the guy who is, today, transforming America into a European socialist “utopia” by nationalizing health care, car companies, financial industries, student loans and bailing out, with trillions – yes, trillions — of our tax dollars, to bail out already failing European socialist nations.

    Remember, this it the guy who supports this kind of relationship between the elite leaders and us shlubb taxpayers, perfectly typified by elitist Nancy Pelosis’s response to questions about Obamacare. When asked specific questions about the impact of Obamcare she responded, ““We have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Who can doubt that the Founders meant that politicians who lust for power should have such power?

    We are in great peril as long as this imperial “president” retains his power.

    Year: 2015.
    Location: In a forest 20 miles north of Manhattan.
    Abdul: “How can you be sure, my brother, that our little drone will fly so low and still reach Times Square to release the anthrax?”
    Mohamed: “Do not worry, my brother, North Koreans built it based on the drone Obama gave to us four years ago. It’s just a lot smaller. We know it works. We know it’s virtually undetectable.”
    Abdul: “Allahu Akbar!”
    Mohamed: “Allahu Akbar!”

What Do You Think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: